US Military Spending to Aide Allies Infograph

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 Pin It Share 0 Email 0 StumbleUpon 0 Reddit 0 LinkedIn 0 0 Flares ×

cato tax dollars at work military spending

Hawks depicted the cuts that Defense Secretary Robert Gates recently proposed for the Pentagon’s weapons programs as a savage assault on the military industrial complex. They insisted that Secretary Gates would leave us prostrate before future rivals.

Counterinsurgency enthusiasts, meanwhile cheered Mr. Gates’s willingness to swap high-tech platforms for capabilities suited to the unconventional conflicts we are fighting.

The truth is that the Gates proposal is both too cautious and inadequate. After all, Gates isn’t cutting non-war-related military spending; he’s raising it slightly, to a whopping $534 billion.

“To really keep us safe, we should slash defense spending.”

If he has his druthers, the next military budget will look much like this one: It will still serve excessive objectives. We will still defend allies that can defend themselves, fight in other people’s civil wars in a vain effort to “fix” their states, and burn tax dollars to serve the hubristic notion that US military hegemony is what keeps the world safe.

To really keep us safe, we should slash defense spending. Americans should prepare for fewer wars, not different ones. Far from providing our defense, our military posture endangers us. It drags us into others’ conflicts, provokes animosity, and wastes resources. We need a defense budget worthy of the name. We need military restraint. And that would allow us to cut defense spending roughly in half.

Two points demonstrate how unambitious the Gates proposal is.

First, he would just replace most canceled programs. Gates suggested ending production of the Air Force’s premier fighter, the F-22. But he wants to accelerate the Joint Strike Fighter program and to buy more F-18s. He would delay the Navy’s procurement of cruisers and its next carrier, but only slightly. He would end the Navy’s DDG-1000 destroyer program, but buy more of the Navy’s older Arleigh Burke class destroyer, and keep buying the Navy’s littoral combat ship.

He proposes breaking up the Army’s modernization program, the Future Combat Systems, and canceling some of the vehicles – but they will be replaced with others. All told, spending on a national missile defense program would be cut by only about 15 percent. read the rest

Trending Around The Interwebs:

Bontheball T-Shirt Shop

Support Bontheball

by signing up with Skreened

Click to Sign Up


Enter your email address to receive daily bontheball postings:

Delivered by mofo-ing Google So Ain't No Spam...ManFeedBurner

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 Pin It Share 0 Email 0 StumbleUpon 0 Reddit 0 LinkedIn 0 0 Flares ×